Research brief · 2026-07-13
Agentic AI governance for Hong Kong enterprises
A practical checklist AIKm uses with clients moving from single-prompt chat assistants to agentic systems that plan and act.
Why agentic AI needs its own governance layer
A prompted chat assistant returns text. An agent decides, calls tools, and changes state in your business. That difference is the entire reason a separate governance layer is needed: the surface area for harm and value is larger, and the audit trail has to reconstruct decisions, not just conversations.
The AIKm eight-point checklist
- Approval boundary. Every agent action has a documented allow list of tools, data sources, and value thresholds. Anything outside triggers a human review.
- Identity and delegation. Agents act under a named service identity that inherits, but never exceeds, the permissions of the human who initiated the task.
- Grounded retrieval. Agents answer from approved knowledge sources through RAG, not from the base model's memory. Every citation is stored with the response.
- Deterministic tool contracts. Tools called by agents have typed inputs and outputs and reject freeform arguments that violate the schema.
- Human-in-the-loop checkpoints. Agents pause before irreversible actions: money movement, external communications, customer records, and legal filings.
- Audit trail. Prompt, plan, tool calls, retrieved sources, and final action are stored together and searchable for a defined retention period.
- Evaluation harness. A regression set of real tasks is run on every model or prompt change, with pass/fail thresholds that gate release.
- Incident response. A runbook defines how to disable an agent, roll back its side effects where possible, and notify affected parties.
Mapping to ISO/IEC 42001
Each of the eight controls above maps to specific ISO/IEC 42001 clauses on AI system life-cycle, risk treatment, and operational controls. AIKm publishes a mapping matrix that clients can drop into their existing management system documentation.
How AIKm uses this in engagements
We take the checklist above, walk it against a client's current AI use cases, and produce a gap register with owners and target dates. The output is a governance memo the board can adopt and an implementation backlog the platform team can execute.
